Quick Answer: Why Are Some Gospels Not In The Bible?

Is the Gospel of Mary authentic?

The Gospel of Mary is a book considered non-canonical in Christian orthodoxy discovered in 1896 in a 5th-century papyrus codex written in Sahidic Coptic.

This Berlin Codex was purchased in Cairo by German diplomat Carl Reinhardt..

What the Gospel of Judas really says?

The Gospel of Judas states that Jesus told Judas “You shall be cursed for generations” and then added, “You will come to rule over them” and “You will exceed all of them, for you will sacrifice the man that clothes me.”

Did Jesus and Mary have a child?

He related that after his crucifixion, Mary Magdalene, along with the family of Lazarus of Bethany, brought the body of Jesus to Provence, and there Mary had a child, Maximin, the fruit of her love for Jesus.

What Gospels are not included in the Bible?

Top 10 Gospels You Won’t Find In The Bible10 The Gospel Of The Ebionites.9 The Gospel Of The Nazarenes.8 The Gospel Of Philip.7 The Gospel Of Truth.6 The Gospel Of The Savior.5 The Infancy Gospel Of Thomas.4 The Gospel Of Peter.3 The Gospel Of Thomas.More items…•

Why is the Gospel of Judas not in the Bible?

The gospel of Judas was written long after the death of Jesus, which eliminates Judas as the author. This discrepancy in time means that the Judas gospel was not based on eyewitness accounts, as were all four of the canonical Gospels.

Are there books missing from the Bible?

The anagignoskomena are Tobit, Judith, Wisdom of Solomon, Wisdom of Jesus ben Sira (Sirach), Baruch, Letter of Jeremiah (in the Vulgate this is chapter 6 of Baruch), additions to Daniel (The Prayer of Azarias, Susanna and Bel and the Dragon), additions to Esther, 1 Maccabees, 2 Maccabees, 3 Maccabees, 1 Esdras, i.e. …

How many gospels were left out of the Bible?

The New Testament has four canonical gospels, which are accepted as the only authentic ones by the great majority of Christians, but many others exist, or used to exist, and are called either New Testament apocrypha or pseudepigrapha.

Why were the 14 books removed from the Bible?

It separated them, because the Bible said so in 2 Esdras 14:46, But keep the seventy last, that thou mayest deliver them only to such as be wise among the people: For in them is the spring of understanding, the fountain of wisdom, and the stream of knowledge. Roman Catholic Bibles have these books in the Old Testament.

Why are the Lost Gospels not in the Bible?

One possible reason they were not included in the emerging New Testament is they were not meant to be part of a wider canon or to be read as scripture in church – instead each one was meant to be read by an elect few.

What are the 7 books left out of the Bible?

A: There are seven books in the Catholic Bible — Baruch, Judith, 1 and 2 Maccabees, Sirach, Tobit and Wisdom — that are not included in the Protestant version of the Old Testament. These books are referred to as the deuterocanonical books.

What are the 14 missing books of the Bible?

14 of these books are included in this volume and these are the books; The First Book of Esdras, The Second Book of Esdras, The First Book of the Maccabees, The Second Book of the Maccabees, The Book of Baruch, The Book of Bel and the Dragon, Ecclesiastes or the Preacher, The Book of Esther, The Book of Judith, The …

What are the hidden books of the Bible?

Contents of The Forgotten Books of EdenThe Conflict of Adam and Eve with Satan (The First and Second Book of Adam and Eve)The Secrets of Enoch (also known as the Slavonic Enoch or Second Enoch)The Psalms of Solomon.The Odes of Solomon.The Letter of Aristeas.The Fourth Book of Maccabees.The Story of Ahikar.More items…

Is there a gospel written by Jesus?

The only known surviving copy of the gospel was found in a codex, or ancient book, that dates back to the third or fourth century A.D. … The Bible’s New Testament Gospels—Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John—depict Judas Iscariot, one of the Twelve Apostles of Jesus, as a traitor.

Which is the most accurate Bible translation?

the New World TranslationBeDuhn states that the New World Translation was “not bias free”, adding that whilst the general public and various biblical scholars might assume that the differences in the New World Translation are the result of religious bias, he considered it to be “the most accurate of the translations compared”, and a ” …